Coding in an absurd reality

• Act 1. Someone makes an outrageous claim about a programming language.^[1]
• Act 2. Someone points that claim out to others.^[2]
• Act 3. Someone compares a snippet of code in the original article to his version in his preferred language and asserts that language is superior.
• Act 4. Someone, in this case me, points out that the exact same solution is possible in the original language. ^[3][4]

A flamewar ensues, where people try to show that their solution in their favorite language is better. Well, that didn't really happen, but it makes for a more dramatic ending.

^[1] I don't claim he's serious. In fact, I think he just ends his post on a tongue-in-cheek, semi-hopeful note.
^[2] Singling out the least interesting part of the blog post as the title of his submission, IMHO
^[3] Which explains the title of this post: if you don't have at least that much understanding of a language that you know whether a certain solution is possible or not, than you probably shouldn't be commenting on it.
^[4] Act 4 has many variations, but usually people produce a different solution in the original language that approaches the solution in the alternative language.